Right to Equality
Polity
The Right to equality means the absence of legal discrimination only on grounds of caste, race, religion, sex, and place of birth and ensures equal rights to all citizens. It is considered a basic feature of the Indian Constitution. The Right to equality is both a positive equality as well as a negative right.
Equality Before Law & Equal Protection of Law
Article 14 says that the State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. This provision confers rights on all persons whether citizens or foreigners. The word 'person' includes legal persons, i.e., statutory corporations, companies, registered societies, or any other type of legal person. The Supreme Court held that where equals and unequals are treated differently, Article 14 does not apply. While Article 14 forbids class legislation, it permits reasonable classification of persons, objects, and transactions by the law, but the classification should not be arbitrary, artificial, or evasive.
- The concept of 'equality before the law' is of British origin while the concept of 'equal protection of laws' has been taken from the American Constitution.
Equal Protection of Laws (Positive Concept)
- Equality of treatment under equal circumstances, both in the privileges conferred and liabilities imposed by the laws,
- Similar application of the same laws to all persons who are similarly situated, and
- Like should be treated alike without any discrimination.
Equality before Law (Negative Concept)
- The concept of 'equality before law' is an element of the concept of 'Rule of Law', propounded by A.V. Dicey, the British jurist.
- Absence of any special privileges in favour of any person.
- Equal subjection of all persons to the ordinary law of the land administered by ordinary law courts.
- No person is above the law, whether rich or poor, high or low, official or non-official.
RULE OF LAW
The concept of Rule of Law has the following three aspects:
- Absence of arbitrary power - No man can be punished except for a breach of law.
- Equality before the law - Equal subjection of all citizens to the ordinary law of the land administered by the ordinary law courts.
- The primacy of the rights of the individual - The constitution is the result of the rights of the individual as defined and enforced by the courts of law rather than the constitution being the source of the individual rights.
Only the first and the second element of the concept given by Dicey are applicable to the Indian System and not the third one. In the Indian System, the constitution is the source of individual rights.
NOTE:
The Supreme Court held that the 'Rule of Law' as embodied in Article 14 is a 'basic feature' of the constitution. Hence, it cannot be destroyed even by an amendment.
Exception of Equality:
The law is not absolute and there are constitutional and other exceptions to it. These are:
- Article 361: The President of India and the Governor of States enjoy some immunities.
- Article 361-A: Protection of publication of any proceedings of either House of Parliament or either House of the Legislature of a State.
- Article 105: No member of Parliament shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said or any vote given by him in Parliament or any committee thereof.
- Article 194: No member of the Legislature of a state shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said or any vote given by him in the Legislature or any committee thereof.
- Article 31-C: The laws made by the state for implementing the Directive Principles contained in clause (b) or clause (c) of Article 39 cannot be challenged on the ground that they are violative of Article 14.
- The foreign sovereigns, ambassadors, and diplomats enjoy immunity from criminal and civil proceedings.
- The UNO and its agencies enjoy diplomatic immunity.
Prohibition of Discrimination on Certain Grounds
Article 15 provides that the State shall not discriminate against any citizen only on the following five grounds:
- Religion
- Race
- Caste
- Sex
- Place of birth
The use of the word 'only' connotes that discrimination on other grounds is not prohibited.
The second provision of Article 15 says that no citizen shall be subjected to any disability, liability, restriction, or condition on the above-mentioned five grounds with regard to:
- Access to shops, public restaurants, hotels, and places of public entertainment; (Only by the State).
- The use of wells, tanks, bathing ghats, roads, and places of public resort maintained wholly or partly by State funds or dedicated to the use of the general public. (By the State and Private individuals).
Exceptions:
- Any special provision for women and children. For example, reservation of seats for women in local bodies or the provision of free education for children.
- Any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes or for the SCs and STs. For example, reservation of seats or fee concessions in public educational institutions.
- Any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes or for the SCs or the STs regarding their admission to educational institutions including private educational institutions, whether aided or unaided by the state, except the minority educational institutions. It was added by the 93rd Amendment Act of 2005.
Equality of Opportunity in Public Employment
Article 16 provides for equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters of employment or appointment to any office under the State. No citizen can be discriminated against or be ineligible for any employment or office under the State on the only grounds of:
- Religion
- Race
- Caste
- Sex
- Place of birth (Article 15)
- Descent or Residence.
Exceptions:
- Parliament can prescribe 'residence' as a condition for certain employment or appointment in a state or union territory or local authority or other authority.
- The State can provide for reservation of appointments or posts in favour of any backward class that is not adequately represented in the state services.
- A law can provide that the incumbent of an office related to the religious/denominational institution or a member of its governing body should belong to the particular religion/denomination.
103rd Constitutional Amendment Act: Changes in Article 15 and 16
The Constitutional (103rd Amendment) Act got the assent of the President of India on 13th January 2018. It provides reservation of jobs in central government jobs as well as government educational institutions. It is also applicable to admissions to private higher educational institutions.
It applies to citizens belonging to the economically weaker sections from the upper castes. This reservation is “in addition to the existing reservations and subject to a maximum of ten percent of the total seats in each category”.
The bill states that it is drafted with a will to mandate Article 46 of the Constitution of India, a Directive Principle that urges the government to protect the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of society.
Article 15 (6) is added to provide reservations to economically weaker sections for admission to educational institutions including private educational institutions, whether aided or unaided by the State, other than the minority educational institutions referred to in clause (1) of Article 30. The amendment aims to provide reservations to those who do not fall in 15 (5) and 15(4) (effectively, SCs, STs, and OBCs).
Article 16 (6) is added to provide reservations to people from economically weaker sections in government posts.
An explanation states that “economic weakness” shall be decided on the basis of “family income” and other “indicators of economic disadvantage.”
Abolition of Untouchability
Article 17 abolishes 'untouchability' and forbids its practice in any form. The enforcement of any disability arising out of untouchability shall be an offence punishable in accordance with the law. The Civil Rights Act, 1955 defines civil right as any right accruing to a person by reason of the abolition of untouchability by Article 17 of the Constitution. The term 'untouchability' has not been defined either in the Constitution or in the Act. The Civil Rights Act, 1955 declares the following acts as offences:
- Preventing any person from entering any place of public worship or from worshipping.
- Justifying untouchability on traditional, religious, philosophical, or other grounds.
- Denying access to any shop, hotel, or places of public entertainment.
- Insulting a person belonging to scheduled caste on the ground of untouchability.
- Refusing to admit persons in hospitals, educational institutions, or hostels established for public benefit.
- Preaching untouchability directly or indirectly.
- Refusing to sell goods or render services to any person.
The Supreme Court held that the right under Article 17 is available against private individuals. A person convicted of the offence of 'untouchability' is disqualified for election to the Parliament or state legislature.
Abolition of Titles
Article 18 abolished titles and makes four provisions in that regard:
- It prohibits the state from conferring any title (except military or academic distinction) on anybody, whether a citizen or a foreigner.
- It prohibits a citizen of India from accepting any title from any foreign state.
- A foreigner holding any office of profit or trust under the state cannot accept any title from any foreign state without the consent of the president.
- No citizen or foreigner holding any office of profit or trust under the State is to accept any present, emolument or office from or under any foreign State without the consent of the president.
In 1996, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the National Awards—Bharat Ratna, Padma Vibhushan, Padma Bhushan, and Padma Shri. It ruled that these awards do not amount to 'titles' within the meaning of Article 18 that prohibits only hereditary titles of nobility. Therefore, they are not violative.
PDF File:
No PDF attached
Subject: Polity
← Back