Extremist Phase (1905–1917)
Modern History
Introduction
• The early 20th century witnessed the rise of a new generation of national leaders called Extremists.
• They were younger, more radical, and rejected the moderate approach of gradual reform.
• Extremists believed that political rights could be won only through bold action, mass mobilization, and self-reliance.
Factors Leading to the Rise of Extremism
1. Recognition of the True Nature of British Rule
• Moderate belief in British justice weakened with time.
• Nationalist writers exposed how British rule caused poverty and economic ruin.
• Key repressive policies:
– 1898: Law against “exciting disaffection.”
– 1899: Indian representation reduced in Calcutta Corporation.
– 1904: Indian Official Secrets Act restricted press freedom.
– Deportation without trial (e.g., Nathu brothers, 1897).
– 1897: Tilak jailed for sedition.
– Section 124A (Sedition) strengthened.
• These convinced Indians that British rule needed to be challenged, not pleaded with.
2. Growth of Self-Respect and Self-Confidence
• Increasing awareness and political consciousness created pride and faith in India’s capacity.
• Tilak and Bipin Chandra Pal emphasized:
– Self-reliance
– Self-respect
– Courage and sacrifice
• Swami Vivekananda inspired youth with the message:
– “Strength is life; weakness is death.”
• Educated Indians became strong supporters of assertive nationalism due to unemployment and exposure to world ideas.
3. International Influences
• Japan’s industrial growth and victory over Russia (1905) shattered myth of European superiority.
• Ethiopia’s victory over Italy (1896).
• Boer Wars (1899–1902) weakened British prestige.
• Nationalist struggles in Ireland, Russia, Turkey, China inspired Indians.
4. Failure of Moderate Methods
• Younger leaders were impatient with slow “prayer–petition–protest” approach.
• They believed Moderates practiced “political mendicancy.”
• Dissatisfaction grew within the Congress.
5. Rise of Extremist Leadership
• Key Extremist leaders:
– Bal Gangadhar Tilak
– Bipin Chandra Pal
– Lala Lajpat Rai
– Aurobindo Ghosh
– Rajnarain Bose
– Ashwini Kumar Datta
– Vishnu Shastri Chiplunkar
6. Militant Nationalist School of Thought
• Since early phase, a militant stream coexisted in Bengal and Maharashtra.
• Most prominent figure: Lokamanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak.
Bal Gangadhar Tilak’s Contributions
• Edited Kesari from 1889; spread nationalism.
• Popularized Ganapati Festival (1893) and Shivaji Festival (1895).
• Led a “No Tax Campaign” (1896–97); advised famine-stricken peasants to withhold revenue.
• Jailed for 18 months in 1897; became symbol of resistance.
Partition of Bengal (1905) and Swadeshi Movement
• Lord Curzon partitioned Bengal into:
– Western Bengal with Bihar & Orissa
– Eastern Bengal & Assam
• Official reason: Administrative convenience.
• Real motive: Weaken nationalism by dividing Bengal along communal and linguistic lines.
Anti-Partition Campaign
• Led by Moderates: Surendranath Banerjee, K.K. Mitra, Prithwish Chandra Ray.
• Tools used:
– Petitions
– Public meetings
– Memoranda
– Press campaigns in Hitabadi, Sanjibani, Bengalee
• Despite strong public opinion, Curzon ignored protests.
Launch of Swadeshi Movement (1905)
• 7 August 1905: Boycott Resolution passed at Calcutta Town Hall.
• Boycott of Manchester cloth and Liverpool salt.
• 16 October 1905: Partition implemented; observed as day of mourning.
• People:
– Fasted, bathed in Ganga
– Sang Vande Mataram and Amar Sonar Bangla (Tagore)
– Tied rakhis for unity
Spread of Swadeshi
• Boycott extended to all British goods.
• Promotion of indigenous industries.
• National education movement started to replace government schools.
Role of Extremists
• Led by Tilak, Pal, Lajpat Rai, Aurobindo.
• Wanted:
– Wider mass participation
– Swaraj as the goal
– Nationwide agitation
• Called for passive resistance and self-reliance.
Surat Split (1907)
• Congress adopted Swaraj as its goal in 1906 under Dadabhai Naoroji.
• However, clashes grew over methods of struggle.
• 1907 Surat Session:
– Violent rift between Moderates & Extremists.
– Congress split; serious setback to national movement.
• Extremists demanded:
– Complete boycott (goods, schools, titles, courts, councils)
– Direct action and mass involvement.
Conclusion
• Extremist phase transformed Indian nationalism into a powerful mass movement.
• It marked a shift from petitions to active resistance, laying foundation for later Gandhian mass struggles.
PDF File:
No PDF attached
Subject: Modern History
← Back